Tautological Post

In my mind, I think that the basic fundamentals of a living conciousness still continue to perplex me, but this is limited only to feeling emotionally confounded at 2 am in the morning.

(I inanely composed that dreadful monstrosity of repetitive tautology for no good reason.)

(And that one as well.)

(This could go on for a while.)

Would anyone else like to attempt composing a sentence with 7 or more instances of redundancy?

Yeah, I didn't think so.

In other news, I am here to impart knowledge which I have scrupulously gathered from the internets: today I learned that vegetarians who eat fish but not meat may be referred to as demi-vegetarians, or pescatarians.  Alternatively, you could say, I am a vegetarian who eats fish. 

Also?  A group of butterflies is called a rabble.  Or you could say a group of butterflies. 

Either way.

And for those of you keeping score at home, the exchange rate is now at 1.483 USD/Euro.

At the moment, that's all I have right now.

(And so on, etc.)

Comments

[Sue]

If you are trying to count them, I will offer some help:

In my mind, I think
basic fundamentals
a living conciousness
still continue
limited only
feeling emotionally
2 am in the morning

If you remove the redundancies, it reads (for example):
In my mind, the fundamentals of conciousness still perplex me, but this is limited to feeling confounded at 2 in the morning.

I wanted to make the entire statement tautological in meaning, but it is only mildly so.

Only mildly?

(Send professional help.)